Outils pour utilisateurs

Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

Lien vers cette vue comparative

Les deux révisions précédentesRévision précédente
Prochaine révision
Révision précédente
en:guide_de_parametrage [2025/09/24 11:56] – [Additional Configurations and Available Controls] adminen:guide_de_parametrage [2025/11/04 16:59] (Version actuelle) – [Enable User Data Entry] admin
Ligne 181: Ligne 181:
 ===== Focus on the customizable online journey ===== ===== Focus on the customizable online journey =====
  
-{{parcourspersonnalisable2.png}}+{{customizable_process.png}}
  
-**Font verification**: A font check of the MRZ band is available. However, this control does not systematically guarantee a conclusive result and may slightly increase processing times.+**Check font type**: A font check of the MRZ band is available. However, if the photo of the identity document provided by the user is of insufficient quality, this check may result in a higher number of failures (KO) and cause a slight increase in processing time.
  
 --- ---
  
-**Monochrome detection**: If the uploaded identity document is monochrome, it will be rejected.+**Detection of monochrome**: If the uploaded identity document is monochrome, it will be rejected.
  
 --- ---
  
-**Detection of alterations and modifications to the ID photo**: This check detects anomalies (wave patterns, RF, pasted photos).+**Detection of alteration and modification of the photo of the title**: This check detects anomalies (wave patterns, RF, pasted photos).
  
 --- ---
  
-**Extraction and verification of information**: The MRZ is automatically corrected, and the checksum verification is performed.+**Extraction and control of information**: The MRZ is automatically corrected, and the checksum verification is performed.
  
 --- ---
  
-**Presentation attack detection**: If the uploaded or captured photo comes from a screen, it will be rejected.+**Detection of attack by presentation**: If the uploaded or captured photo comes from a screen, it will be rejected.
  
 --- ---
Ligne 212: Ligne 212:
 --- ---
  
-**Check for the existence of both sides of the document**: If two sides are required and only one is provided, the file will be marked as KO.+**Verify the existence of both sides of the document**: If two sides are required and only one is provided, the file will be marked as KO.
  
 ===== Additional Configurations and Available Controls ===== ===== Additional Configurations and Available Controls =====
Ligne 286: Ligne 286:
 The entered last name is compared with both the birth name and the usual name. The entered last name is compared with both the birth name and the usual name.
  
-🔧 If you still want to perform such checks while redirecting the user to the ID360 identification URL—without letting them modify the expected dataan API method is available to push this data into the system (see: Developer Guide).+🔧 If you still want to perform such checks while redirecting the user to the ID360 identification URL—without letting them modify the expected dataan API method is available to push this data into the system (see: Developer Guide). 
 + 
 +===== String Comparison in ID360 =====
  
 🔧 The algorithm used is a fuzzy matching. 🔧 The algorithm used is a fuzzy matching.
 +
 +ID360 uses a **three-step approach** to compare strings.  
 +The goal is to enable reliable comparisons even when strings contain accents, special characters, or linguistic variations.
 +
 +==== 1. Unidecode Step ====
 +
 +The first step is to **remove accents and diacritical marks** to standardize the comparison.  
 +This allows words to be compared as if they were written using only standard ASCII characters.
 +
 +**Example:**
 +  * élodie → elodie
 +
 +Thus, *élodie* and *elodie* will be considered **identical** at this stage.
 +
 +==== 2. Generic Transliteration Step ====
 +
 +Once accents are removed, ID360 applies a **generic transliteration**.  
 +This process converts non-ASCII characters (such as letters specific to certain languages) into their most common Latin alphabet equivalents.  
 +The original language of the word is **not** taken into account here — only a standard transliteration is applied.
 +
 +**Examples:**
 +  * weiß → weiss  
 +  * düker → duker
 +
 +This step makes it possible to harmonize strings originating from different languages without knowing the linguistic context.
 +
 +==== 3. Precise Transliteration Step ====
 +
 +The final step performs a **contextual transliteration**, taking into account the **original language of the text**.  
 +For identity documents (passports, national ID cards, etc.), the language used corresponds to the **issuing country of the document**.
 +
 +As a result, some letters are transformed differently depending on the language.
 +
 +**Examples:**
 +
 +  *For Germany (DE)* :
 +  * Jörg → Joerg  
 +  * Düker → Dueker
 +
 +  *For France (FR)* :
 +  * Jörg → Jorg  
 +  * Düker → Duker
 +
 +This language-aware transliteration provides a **comparison more faithful to the document’s context**.
 +
 +==== Notes ====
 +
 +  * Specific transliteration rules depend on the **country of origin**.
 +  * European countries are generally less affected by these differences, but **Germany** is a notable exception, as its rules are frequently used in official documents.
 +  * Other countries may apply their own conventions depending on their civil registry standards or national requirements.
 +
 +==== Summary ====
 +
 +ID360 compares strings through a progressive process:
 +
 +  - **Character normalization** (removal of accents)  
 +  - **Universal transliteration** (generic conversion of non-ASCII characters)  
 +  - **Contextual transliteration** (conversion adapted to the document’s language)
 +
 +This method ensures a **robust, consistent, and linguistically accurate comparison**.
  
  

This website uses cookies. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Also, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree, please leave the website.

Plus d’informations